Janus: Papers of Joseph Needham as a historian of Chinese science, technology and medicine

Needham/NRI2/SCC2/49/1 contains:
<-- See earlier
64	Letter from Dr. R. F. Willets of the Department of Greek , University of Birmingham about an 'illustration of the theological quality of the concept of abstract law in Sophocles' and other matters and copy of Joseph Needham's reply
65	Letter from Derk Bodde of Philadephphia, U.S.A. about a course on Chinese legal thought provided in association with the University of Pennyslvania Law School, U.S.A.
66	Letter from Guy W. Shoup of New York City, U.S.A. about his work for an article analysing current and past treatment of patent, trademark or copyright accorded by the People's Republic of China
67	Cutting of an article from an unnamed newspaper entitled 'Invalid Carriage Banned'
68	Letter from Richard H. Minear of Hamden, Connecticut, U.S.A. about a misreprentation of Joseph Needham's work in his book 'Japanese Tradition and Western Law'
69	Letter from Prof. A. R. Beeston of St. John's College, Oxford about the concept of a Creator-God of Laws of Nature in Chinese thought and copy of Joseph Needham's reply
70	Letter from Stephen Callary of Montreal, Canada, about his 'study in comparative aspects of Chinese and European law' in respect of the the 'oral tradition'
71	Letter from Glynn Faithful of Braziers Adult College, Ipsden, Oxford, accompanying a copy of his article entitled 'Why Radial' published in 'Forum for Correspondence and Contact', (New York)
72	Typescript of a Joseph Needham lecture, 'Were Laws of Nature Necessary?'
73	Letter from Huang Xiang [?? / Huang Hsiang] of the Law Department, Southwest Politics and Law College, Chongqing, Szechuan, China, about the relationship between law and science and copy of Joseph Needham's reply
74	Related bibliographical references, advertisements for books, brief notes and quotations
See later -->