| St John's Library/Beaton/A3/1 contains: |
| <-- See earlier |
| 59 |
"Mr. Beaton's new creation is NOT a still life" |
| 60 |
"Successful Newcastle reception for the new Cecil Beaton play" |
| 61 |
Typescript copy of letter to Jack Minster |
| 62 |
Text of telegram for Jack Minster, to be phoned by Eileen Hose to Bruce Montgomery |
| 63 |
Autograph letter signed to Beaton |
| 64 |
Autograph letter signed to Beaton |
| 65 |
"Gainsborough's life in drama form entertaining qualities" |
| 66 |
Typescript letter signed with autograph postscript, to Beaton in London |
| 67 |
"Statement for the northern press", typescript, signed [never sent] |
| 68 |
Typescript letter signed from London to Wolfit in Hurstbourne Tarrant (Hampshire) |
| 69 |
Typescript letter to Beaton |
| See later --> |
|
Papers of Sir Cecil Beaton
| Title |
Typescript letter to Beaton |
| Reference |
A3/1/74 |
| Creator |
Eileen Hose |
| Covering Dates |
14 Oct. 1959 |
| Extent and Medium |
4 p.; paper |
|
| Content and context |
Milmo studied the rules of Equity. A complaint from Beaton would not be a privileged occasion as he is not a member. Beaton would be open to a long and expensive libel action. His defence could only be a plea of justification, i.e. he would have to justify all the statements made in his complaint. Statements would have to be taken from Minster, Seale and the members of the cast. The hearing of the case would take at least a fortnight. Milmo will try to see if Equity has ever taken complaints from non members. Any complaints put forward to the Society of West End Theatre Managers by Minster, a member, would be privileged, so there is no need to change the statement. |
| Index Terms |
| Wolfit, Sir Donald (1902-1968) Knight, actor and theatre manager |
| No further on-line information. |
|