| Declares that he had hoped to be first to come to the M[etaphysical?] the previous night, where he and HS 'might have snatched a moment...to settle the point raised in [HS's] note' of nine days previously. Failing an interview, has decided to write regarding the matter. States that he has read HS's [ ] 'pretty carefully', and thinks that the general public, in consideration of his 'effective and interesting treatment of the questions between Leslie and Lowe, will allow themselves to be tempted into the severer matter of the definitions.' Believes his piece to be suited to the readers of the Fortnightly Review, and will give to students of economics a subject to reflect upon. Suggests that the short paper 'What is Money?' should be published as the 'next instalment'. Refers to the fact that Leslie might wish to reply to HS's paper. Reports that he has spoken to the [Rector] about the [Athenaeum] Club, and is awaiting his reply. States that he admires 'the Virgil' much, and observes that 'Myers seems...to have true literary faculty, as [Symonds] has, or Church', and asks why he does not produce more. With envelope. (2 docs) |