Explains that she carried off Dr Henry Jackson's letter by mistake, and encloses it, along with a note from J.B. Mayor [neither included]. Claims that the latter 'throws some light on the article.' Believes that it would be a mistake to print the article in a collection of HS' papers 'because his part is so very short', but adds that [ ] Shipley, to whom she showed it 'is much charmed with it as an imitation of Plato.' Adds that HS' part only brings out one point, and that they have no way of knowing 'whether he considered Grotes [sic] answer satisfactory - whether the G[ ] of the latter part of the whole paper can be considered as representing Henry's view or not.' Speculates on the circumstances of the discussion, and suggests that it took place at Trumpington, and states that she believes that it should be referred to in any bibliography. Undertakes to send back 'the number of the N[ ] Review' with the number of the Contemporary [Review] containing the article on 'Verification of Beliefs and one in the Nineteenth Ccentury which should be [consistent] but is...p[ ] [ ] in the Ph[ ]'. Explains that she thinks that HS intended Miss Jones 'to judge whether ethical matter not yet printed should be published or whether printed ethical articles should be republished', but states that she believes that Jones is 'a little too much inclined to publish', and that she may argue with her about particular papers before a final decision is come to. Refers to [HS'] papers in Mind, to notices of books, and to ethical and philosophical papers, and suggests that they discuss the republication of these various works with regard to the arrangement of volumes. Sets out her idea of the ideal format of a volume 'of Philosophical and Ethical Fragments', and lists the titles or subjects of articles, lectures and other works, and the publications in which they appeared.